School-Based Management in Benguet, Philippines: Its Impact to Quality Improvement among Public Secondary School Heads
Main Article Content
Abstract
Experts agree that there is a need for continuous evaluation and upgrading for school-based management (SMB) to be fully realized. In the Philippines, there had been few attempts at the national level but in-depth, localized evaluation is being recommended. Hence, this study was conceptualized to document and determine the effect of SMB on the school heads’ governance of secondary school in Benguet, Philippines. The study employed both quantitative method (structured survey) and qualitative method (focused group discussion and interviews). Results showed that the use of SMB by school heads is a key factor in effectively running the school system. Manifestations of these are observed in the very satisfactory application of the SMB knowledge and skills in school governance with minimal support and guidance from their superiors. In addition, the school heads’ extent of application of the acquired SBM knowledge and skills have influenced their capability in school governance. However, the school heads expressed developmental needs to further their management skills. Such results imply a substantial realization on the implementation of SMB in secondary schools embarking on institutionalizing quality improvement measures in all program areas as mandated in their respective school systems
Article Details
References
Abulencia, A.S. (2013). School-based management: A structural reform intervention. Retrieve from:http://www.pnu.edu.ph/page/journal/ School-Based_Management_A-Structural_Re form_Intervention.pdf
Adams, J.E., Jr., & Kirst, M.W. (1999). New demands and concepts for educationalaccountability: Striving for results in an era of excellence. In J. Murphy (Ed.), Handbook ofResearch on Educational Administration, 463-489. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
Barrera-Osorio, F., Fasih, T., Patrinos, H.A., & With- Santibañez, L. (2009). Decentralized decision- making in schools: The theory and evidence on school-based management. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
Basic Education Sector Reform Agenda (BESRA). (2009). Moving Forward in the Implementation of the Basic Education Sector Reform Agenda (BESRA). http://www.deped.gov.ph/2009/04/13/ do-34-s-2009-moving-forward-in-the-implemen tation-of-the-basic-education-sector-reform- agenda-besra/
Blase, J., & Blase, J. (2001). Empowering teachers: What successful principals do (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Bryke, A.S., & Schneider, B. (2002). Trust in schools: A core resource for improvement. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
Caldwell, B.J. (2005). School-based management, education policy series. The International institute of Educational Planning and the International Academy of Education, Paris: UNESCO.
Cameron, K.S., & Whetten, D.A. (1981). Perceptions of organizational effectiveness over organizational life cycles. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26: 525-544.
Daft, R.L. (2008). Management. Thomson Learning Asia, Singapore. Thomson Asian edition, 8th edition. pp. 2- 10.
Forsyth, P.B., Barnes, L.L.B., & Adams, C.M. (2006). Trust-Effectiveness Patterns In Schools. Journal of Educational Administration, 44(2): 122-141.
Gamage, D., & San Antonio, D. (2006). Effective participatory school administration, leadership, and management: Does it affect the trust levels of stakeholders? Retrieved from http://cnx.org/ content/ m14112/1.2/
Gertler, P., Patrinos, H., & Rubio-Codina, M. (2007). Methodological issues in the evaluation of school- based management reforms. Draft, World Bank, Washington, DC.
Goertz, M.E. (2000, April). Local Accountability: The role of the district and school in monitoring policy, practice and achievement. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, Louisiana. Retrieved from the ERIC database. (ED445032)
Hallinger, P. (1991). Instructional leadership in secondary schools: Developing a framework. In P. George & E.C. Potter (Eds.), School-Based Management: Theory and Practice, 46-51.Reston, VA: National Association of Secondary School Principals.
Hallinger, P., & Heck, R.H. (1996). Reassessing the principal's role in school effectiveness: A review of empirical research, 1980-1995. Education Administration Quarterly, 32(1): 5-44.
Itika, J.S. (2011). Fundamentals of human resource management: Emerging experiences from Africa. Leiden, Netherlands: African Studies Centre.
Khattri, N., Ling, C., & Jha, S. (2010). “The Effects of School-based Management in the Philippines: An Initial Assessment Using Administrative Data” Policy Research Working Paper Series. No. 5248, World Bank, Washington, D.C. and
Yamauchi, F. (2014) “An Alternative Estimate of School-based Management Impacts on Students’ Achievements: Evidence from the Philippines.” Journal of Development Effectiveness. 6, no. 2: 97-110.
Leithwood, K., & Riehl, C. (2003). What we know about successful school leadership. Paper prepare for the AERA Division A Task Force for the Development of an Agenda for Future Research on Educational Leadership. Retrieved from http://dcbsimpson.com/randd-leithwood- successful-leadership.pdf
Lubrica, P., Alvaro, M., Montemayor, M., Carino, E., & Namuhe, M. (2011), School-based management competencies among school heads in the secondary public school systems in Benguet and Ifugao: An Assessment. Research and Educational Development Training Institute, Philippines. ISSN 1656-166. Volume 8: pp.338-345 Mulford, B. (1996). Do school principals make a difference? Recent evidence and implications. Leading and Managing, 2(3), 155-170.
Nelly, T. (2008). Roles, duties and responsibilities of school management team. Training manual for secondary school managers. Kigali, Africa: Mineduc School Management.
Santibañez, L. (2006). What is school-based management. Washington, DC: Education, Human Development Network. Sharma, S., & Kannan, S. (2012). Instructional supervision: A tool for improvement or weapon for punishment. The International Research Journal of Social Science & Management, 2(8): 29-35.
Siegall, M., & Worth, C. (2001). The impacts of trust and control on faculty reactions to merit pay. Personnel Review, 30(6): 646-656.
Spear, J.P. (1983). School site budgeting/ management: The state of the art. Washington, DC: ERIC Clearinghouse. Retrieved from http:// eric.ed.gov/?id=ED231082
Tschannen-Moran, M. (2001). Collaboration and the need for trust. Journal of Educational Administration, 39(4): 308-331.
Walker, A., & Dimmock, C. (2000). Mapping the way ahead: leading educational leadership into the globalised world. School Leadership & Management, 20(2): 227-233.
Wallace Foundation. (2013). The school principal as a leader: guiding schools to better teaching and learning (2nd ed.). New York, USA: Author. Retrieved from http://www.wallacefoundation. org/knowledge-center/school-leadership/effective-principalleadership/Pages/overview- the-school-principal-as-leader.aspx
Waters, T., Marzano, R.J., & McNulty, B. (2003). Balanced leadership: What 30 years of research tells us about the effect of leadership on student achievement. Denver, CO: Mid-Continent Regional Education Laboratory.
Weng, F.Y. (2003). Centralization and decentralization in educational governance in Taiwan, in Mok, K.H, centralization and decentralization: Educational reforms and changing governance in Chinese societies. Hong Kong: Comparative Education Research centre, the University of Hong Kong.
World Bank & AusAID (2013). “School-based Management in the Philippines: An Empirical Investigation.” World Bank and AusAID, Manila. World Bank & AusAID (2016). “Assessing School- based Management in the Philippines”. Philippine Education Note, 5: 1-16.