Assessment of Needs and Problems of The Bsit Students on Computer Programming Skills
Article Sidebar
Published
Jul 10, 2020
Main Article Content
Abstract
The study aimed to determine the extent of needs and problems of Bachelor of Science in Information Technology (BSIT) students on computer programming skills; the relationship between the perceived needs and perceived problems; and the relationship between computer programming skills with the extent of needs and problems. The study was conducted to enhance the computer programming skills ofBSIT students of the Benguet State University by addressing perceived needs or problems.
Results show that there were facility-related, curriculum-related and teacher related aspects considered to be of much need and of great problem by students. The perceived needs are related to perceived problems. Facility-related and Curriculum-related needs are related to computer programming skills on IT subjects such as Problem Solving & Programming, Microcomputer Systems Organization, Database Management System and Object-Oriented Programming & Technology skills.
Article Details
Section
Articles
References
ADEDIWURA and TAYO, 2007. Perception of teachers' knowledge, attitude and teaching skills as predictor of academic performance in Nigerian secondary schools, Date Accessed: November 18, 2008 from http://www.academicjournals.org/EPR/pdf 2007/Jul/Adediwura andTayo.pdf
AKINTAYO, D., et. al. 2008. lnfluence of Teacher's Personality And Instructional Strategy On Perceived Academic Performance Of Participants In Professional Education In Nigerian Universities, Date Accessed: February 7, 2009 from http://www.cluteinstituteonlinejournalscom/Programs/Rothenburg_2008/Article%20283.pdf
BENNET, FREDERICK. 1999. Computers As Tutors: Solving the Crisis Education, pp. 58-59, Faben Inc.: Sarasota, Florida,USA
CARUSO, JUDITH BORRESON. 2008. The EGAR Study of Undergraduate Students and Information Technology, 2008, pp.2-4, EDUCAUSE Center for Applied Research, 2008: Boulder, Colorado, USA
CHED MEMORANDUM ORDER (CMO) NO. 25 Series of 2001. REVISED POLICIES AND STANDARDS FOR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY EDUCATION (ITE), pp. 9-12, Date Accessed: July 15, 2008 from http://www.ched.gov.ph/policies/CM02001/CMO 25.DOC
CHAO, LEE. 2008. Strategies and Technologies for Developing Online Computer Labs for Technology-Based Courses, Date Accessed: February 6, 2009 from http://www.igi-global.com/reference/details.asp?ID=6895&v=preface
DILLS, ANGELA, et.al. 2007. Course scheduling and academic performance, Date accessed: February 7, 2009 from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6VB9-4PYGW3J-1 /2/3041591 Ob488e57127fafa51253ef7e1
HOWARD, DANIEL, et.al. 2006. Brandon Technology Evaluation, Date Accessed: February6, 2009from http ://morrisbrandon. com/tech/BrandonFinalBriefingjul06.pdf
HORSBURGH, MARGARET. 1999. Quality Monitoring in Higher Education: the impact on student learning, Date accessed: February 7, 2009 from C:\Documents and Settings\frevie\Desktop\revlit\Quality Monitoring in Higher Education the impact on student learning - Quality in Higher Education.htm
ICT FORWARD TEAM. 2007. Top Ten Recommendations for the Thai ICT Industry, Date accessed: February 8, 2009 from www.asiaonline.neUblogs/ictforward
KAREMERA, DAVID, et.al. 2003. The effects of academic environment and background characteristics on student satisfaction and performance: the case of South Carolina State University"s School of Business, Date Accessed: February 7, 2009 from http ://goliath. ecnext.com/coms2/summary O 199-2885425 ITM
NEWBY, DAVID, et.al. 2008. Examining student outcomes in university computer laboratory environments: Issues for educational management, Date accessed: February 7, 2009 from http://www. emerald insight. com/lnsighUviewContentltem.do;jsessionid= 0FBDF2912253A3A02009249EDF329FA1?contentType=Article&hdAction=lnkpdf&contentld=1729208
OFFICE OF FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT OFWASHINGTON D.C. 2001. InformationTechnology Upgrade Policy Review, Date accessed: February 8, 2009 from www.ofm.wa.gov/budgeUinfo/itupgrade.pdf
SCHULTZ, LEAH, et. al. 2007. The Effect of Class Duration on Academic Performance and Attendance in an Introductory Computer Class, Date accessed: February 7, 2009 from http://www.isedj.org/isecon/2007/3143/ISECON.2007.Schultz.pdf
THE FACULTY MANAGEMENT OF ROBERT GORDON UNIVERSITY n. d. Teachers' ICT skills and knowledge needs, Date accessed: February 8, 2009 from www.scot I and .gov. u k/1 i bra ry/ict/a p pendsection1.htm
TENESSEE ADVISORY COMMISSION ON INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS. 2003. Do K-12 School Facilities Affect Education Outcomes?, Date accessed: February 7, 2009 from http://www.state.tn.us/tacir/PDF FILES/Education/SchFac.pdf
UNITED NATIONS EDUCATIONAL, SCIENTIFIC AND CULTURAL ORGANIZATION. 2008. Date accessed: February 8, 2009 from www.unesco.org/en/competencystandards-teachers.
AKINTAYO, D., et. al. 2008. lnfluence of Teacher's Personality And Instructional Strategy On Perceived Academic Performance Of Participants In Professional Education In Nigerian Universities, Date Accessed: February 7, 2009 from http://www.cluteinstituteonlinejournalscom/Programs/Rothenburg_2008/Article%20283.pdf
BENNET, FREDERICK. 1999. Computers As Tutors: Solving the Crisis Education, pp. 58-59, Faben Inc.: Sarasota, Florida,USA
CARUSO, JUDITH BORRESON. 2008. The EGAR Study of Undergraduate Students and Information Technology, 2008, pp.2-4, EDUCAUSE Center for Applied Research, 2008: Boulder, Colorado, USA
CHED MEMORANDUM ORDER (CMO) NO. 25 Series of 2001. REVISED POLICIES AND STANDARDS FOR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY EDUCATION (ITE), pp. 9-12, Date Accessed: July 15, 2008 from http://www.ched.gov.ph/policies/CM02001/CMO 25.DOC
CHAO, LEE. 2008. Strategies and Technologies for Developing Online Computer Labs for Technology-Based Courses, Date Accessed: February 6, 2009 from http://www.igi-global.com/reference/details.asp?ID=6895&v=preface
DILLS, ANGELA, et.al. 2007. Course scheduling and academic performance, Date accessed: February 7, 2009 from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6VB9-4PYGW3J-1 /2/3041591 Ob488e57127fafa51253ef7e1
HOWARD, DANIEL, et.al. 2006. Brandon Technology Evaluation, Date Accessed: February6, 2009from http ://morrisbrandon. com/tech/BrandonFinalBriefingjul06.pdf
HORSBURGH, MARGARET. 1999. Quality Monitoring in Higher Education: the impact on student learning, Date accessed: February 7, 2009 from C:\Documents and Settings\frevie\Desktop\revlit\Quality Monitoring in Higher Education the impact on student learning - Quality in Higher Education.htm
ICT FORWARD TEAM. 2007. Top Ten Recommendations for the Thai ICT Industry, Date accessed: February 8, 2009 from www.asiaonline.neUblogs/ictforward
KAREMERA, DAVID, et.al. 2003. The effects of academic environment and background characteristics on student satisfaction and performance: the case of South Carolina State University"s School of Business, Date Accessed: February 7, 2009 from http ://goliath. ecnext.com/coms2/summary O 199-2885425 ITM
NEWBY, DAVID, et.al. 2008. Examining student outcomes in university computer laboratory environments: Issues for educational management, Date accessed: February 7, 2009 from http://www. emerald insight. com/lnsighUviewContentltem.do;jsessionid= 0FBDF2912253A3A02009249EDF329FA1?contentType=Article&hdAction=lnkpdf&contentld=1729208
OFFICE OF FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT OFWASHINGTON D.C. 2001. InformationTechnology Upgrade Policy Review, Date accessed: February 8, 2009 from www.ofm.wa.gov/budgeUinfo/itupgrade.pdf
SCHULTZ, LEAH, et. al. 2007. The Effect of Class Duration on Academic Performance and Attendance in an Introductory Computer Class, Date accessed: February 7, 2009 from http://www.isedj.org/isecon/2007/3143/ISECON.2007.Schultz.pdf
THE FACULTY MANAGEMENT OF ROBERT GORDON UNIVERSITY n. d. Teachers' ICT skills and knowledge needs, Date accessed: February 8, 2009 from www.scot I and .gov. u k/1 i bra ry/ict/a p pendsection1.htm
TENESSEE ADVISORY COMMISSION ON INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS. 2003. Do K-12 School Facilities Affect Education Outcomes?, Date accessed: February 7, 2009 from http://www.state.tn.us/tacir/PDF FILES/Education/SchFac.pdf
UNITED NATIONS EDUCATIONAL, SCIENTIFIC AND CULTURAL ORGANIZATION. 2008. Date accessed: February 8, 2009 from www.unesco.org/en/competencystandards-teachers.